Ti | = | Criteria |
|
0.sec | = | We will ask them to determine whether projects are impactful, evidence-based, feasible, and durable. |
|
1.sec | = | Impactful is the goal of the competition. Does the proposal describe the urgent problem worth solving, and will the solution have a transformative impact? G/MacArthur100Change/Criteria/Impactful/0.md |
|
2.sec | = | The second criteria is evidence-based. We want to know, will the solution work? Does the proposal present evidence that the solution or critical components of it have previously yielded practical and concrete results? This is not a competition to test a new idea or theory. Does the evidence suggest that the solution can be adapted to other contexts, such as expanding to new populations or geographies, or to reach a greater number of people over time, and still retain its effectiveness? G/MacArthur100Change/Criteria/Evidence/0.md |
|
3.sec | = | The third criteria is feasible. When it comes to feasibility, the kinds of questions we want peers and wise heads to consider are: Does the team have the skills, capacity, relationships, and experience to deliver its proposal? G/MacArthur100Change/Criteria/Feasible/0.md |
|
4.sec | = | The last criteria, durable, is the one that sets 100&Change apart. If we were focused on solving a problem, we want the $100 million solution to have a sustained impact. G/MacArthur100Change/Criteria/Durable/0.md |
|
| = | [G/Z/ol/s4] |
|
History: | = | |
|
Source URL | = | [https: www.macfound.org/press/article/frequently-asked-questions/#6%20What%20criteria] |
|
Note | = | Additions (not part of the original): |
|
Table | = | - {Impactful.Sec}
- {Evidence.Sec}
- {Feasible.Sec}
- {Durable.Sec}
|
|
Impactful. | = | [G/MacArthur100Change/Criteria/Impactful/0.md] |
|
Evidence. | = | [G/MacArthur100Change/Criteria/Evidence/0.md] |
|
Feasible. | = | [G/MacArthur100Change/Criteria/Feasible/0.md] |
|
Durable. | = | [G/MacArthur100Change/Criteria/Durable/0.md] |