Ti | = | Feasible |
1.Ti | = | Score |
Scale.Bottom | = | Unrealistic |
Scale.Top | = | Feasible |
0.sec | = | Does the team have the skills, capacity, relationships, and experience to deliver its proposal? Do the budget and project plan represent a realistic understanding of a successful implementation of the solution? Does the proposal outline a mitigation plan for risks associated with changes in key personnel and political, market, or social environments? |
1.Score | = | 0.1-0.9 |
1.sec | = | Failed to demonstrate a cohesive team with capabilities to deliver the proposed solution; presented an impractical budget and/or project plan; no mitigation plan for risks. |
2.Score | = | 1.1-1.9 |
2.sec | = | Described a team with basic abilities but lacking in knowledge or training; offered an insufficient budget and/or project plan; minimal mitigation planning. |
3.Score | = | 2.1-2.9 |
3.sec | = | Proposed a competent, qualified team with clear strengths; presented a realistic budget and project plan with sufficient attention to detail; adequate |
mitigation planning. | = | |
4.Score | = | 3.1-3.9 |
4.sec | = | Presented a team of accomplished professionals with a record of success; budget and project plan were detailed, measurable, and cost effective; thorough mitigation planning. |
5.Score | = | 4.1-5.0 |
5.sec | = | Led by an experienced team of qualified experts who have achieved remarkable results; budget and project plan grounded in past success; comprehensive mitigation planning. |
= | [G/MacArthur100Change/Widget/CriteriaTable.md] |