Ti	=	Durable
Scale.Bottom	=	Temporary
Scale.Top	=	Permanent
0.sec	=	Will the solution have a sustained impact? Does the solution either expect to solve a problem in five years or create a pathway to solving the problem over time? Will the project elicit support from other sources – private, philanthropic or public? Has the team advanced a clear, cogent, and compelling vision for the future?
1.Score	=	0.1-0.9
1.sec	=	Offered a solution with little to no long-term impact; presented no opportunities to elicit support from other sources; no vision for the future.
2.Score	=	1.1-1.9
2.sec	=	Offered a solution that requires continual investment for sustained impact with low probability of ongoing support from other sources; hazy vision for future.
3.Score	=	2.1-2.9
3.sec	=	Offered a solution with a well-defined pathway toward sustainability; ongoing support is possible but not assured; vision for the future is not realistic.
4.Score	=	3.1-3.9
4.sec	=	Proposed a solution with a plausible, well-defined pathway toward sustainability; ongoing support, if needed, seems probable; vision for the future is compelling and realistic.
5.Score	=	4.1-5.0
5.sec	=	Proposed an enduring solution; ongoing support, if required, is nearly guaranteed; vision for future is compelling and attainable.
	=	[G/MacArthur100Change/Widget/CriteriaTable.md]