# User Story	=
As a corporate lawyer in Tech, I want to craft NDAs that leverage prose objects, so that I can ensure:	=
- consistency,	=
- reusability,	=
- expedited turn around	=
for repeated requests	=
As a corporate lawyer, I want NDAs that can be self-served by company agents so that legal is not a bottle neck unnecessarily.	=
As a corporate lawyer in Tech, I want to protect IP assignments and filing strategies.	=
As a corporate lawyer receiving an NDA, I want legible and clear data handling requirements so that we incur less risk.	=
As a corporate lawyer sending an NDA, I want legible and clear data handling requirements so that I have less counterparty risk.	=
As a corporate lawyer dealing with an NDA, I want data handling requirements to be easier to automate.	=
As a corporate lawyer, I want to use legal clauses that have been hardened by public review so that I can reduce risk in legal strategy	=
As a counterparty to an NDA, I want legal clauses that have been hardened by public review so that:	=
- I have resources for evaluating the terms	=
- public expectations are set around acceptable, non-abusive terms	=
RE: Stanford vs Roche	=
## Acceptance Criteria	=
- Can create and use formats, templates	=
- Could assign legal performance and results at prose object level	=
- Can set up automation processes on:	=
- prose objects,	=
- documents, and	=
- document portfolios	=
- “Playbooks” set of internal contract goals, sorted by pre-approval or needs approval	=
- Editing + approval process when system has no pre-existing internal legal guidance, prose object, or defined dictionary	=
--------	=
# User Story Format:	=
As a x, I want y, so that z.	=
Acceptance Criteria	=
- Given (state condition), then (expected result)	=