/Docs/G/UMA-Use-Cases-CmA/0.md
  Source views: Source JSON(ish) on GitHub (VSCode)   Doc views: Document (&k=1.r00t): Visual Print Technical: OpenParameters Xray

---

Lex Informatica Considerations

1. A. UMA Value Proposition for Programmable Devices, Network Systems, and Applications
   
   1. Consumer Access Control (Autonomy)
   2. Trusted Relationships (Reciprocity)
   3. Default Rules/Policies (Objectivity)
2. UMA Consent Advantages
   
   1. Diachronic Consent/Access Control
   2. Asynchronous Consent/Access Control
   3. Delegated/Distributed Authorization Chain
3. UMA Legal Advantages
   
   1. Jurisdictional: Networks and Cross-Border Interoperability
   2. Customization of Consumer Control over Access Rights/Permissions
   3. Self-Enforcement: Monitoring and Ex Ante
4. UMA Legal Challenges
   
   1. Data Ownership – How Does the Consumer Gain Access Control?
   2. Device Function Control – Who Controls?
   3. Identity and Authorization of RqPs
   4. Downstream Control and Monitoring of Personal Information Access, Distribution, and Use Rights
   5. How enforce access controls and authorizations/permissions?